Do Modern IVF Labs Provide a Real Benefit?
Yes! Alpha Environmental, Inc. has worked with clients
who want to insure that their IVF laboratory suite is a “state
of the art” facility, as verified by commissioning and
maintained to that high standard. Alpha has collaborated
with three facilities that we designed and commissioned to
conduct a retrospective study. These studies demonstrated
a statistically significant increase in pregnancy rates in
two facilities and a statistically significant increase in
implantation rates for all three facilities. A summary of
our results appears below:
The practice of Dr. James Goldfarb, Medical Director, and
Dr. Nina Desai, Laboratory Director of the Cleveland Clinic
Foundation in Beachwood, Ohio has gone from an uncontrolled
IVF laboratory in a busy surgical suite, to an isolated, modern
IVF laboratory. The results showed a statistically significant
increase in their permanency rates and implantation rates
for all patient age groups. The data for all patients is shown
below:
| Year |
Retrievals |
Pregnancy |
% |
_ ET |
Implant IR |
(%) |
1997-1998
Traditional IVF Lab |
445 |
159 |
35.7 |
1567 |
243 |
15.5 |
1999-2002
Modern IVF Lab |
1194 |
593 |
49.6 |
3448 |
907 |
32.6 |
Dr. Jacques Stassart, Medical Director, and Dr. G. David
Ball, Laboratory Director of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility
Associates in Woodbury, Minnesota showed a statistically significant
increase in their implantation rates. An increase in their
pregnancy rate was seen but it was not statistically significant.
The data for all patients is shown below:
| Year |
Retrievals |
Pregnancy |
% |
_ ET |
Implant IR |
(%) |
2000- 2001
Traditional IVF Lab |
346 |
159 |
45.95 |
952 |
240 |
25.2 |
2001-2002
Modern IVF Lab |
329 |
166 |
50.5 |
1119 |
357 |
31.9 |
Dr. Sangita Jindal, Laboratory Director of The Institute
for Reproductive Medicine and Health in Hartsdale, New York
also had a similar increase in pregnancy and implantation
rates. The data for all patients is shown below:
| Year |
Retrievals |
Pregnancy |
% |
_ ET |
Implant IR |
(%) |
2002
Traditional IVF Lab |
200 |
66 |
33.0% |
616 |
94 |
15.2 |
2003
Modern IVF Lab |
185 |
83 |
44.9% |
531 |
110 |
20.9 |
|